The Israeli choke-hold on Gaza remains unrelenting as the death toll continues to rise since the Great March of Return began at the end of March.
The border protests, which were only supposed to run until the end of Ramadan, quickly escalated in the face of unprovoked Israeli aggression. More than 18,000 Palestinians have been wounded by Israeli sniper fire, tear gas and drone attacks. At least 164 deaths have so far been confirmed by health officials.
The most recent protest at the time of writing, saw three Palestinians killed by Israeli drone attacks and at least 131 more wounded by bullet fire. One of the dead included yet another paramedic.
Following the June murder of paramedic Razan al-Najjar, Friday 10 August saw 26-year-old Abdullah al-Qatiti murdered by Israeli forces. The previous Friday saw 220 injured and one killed.
The week prior to this was a stark reminder to the world of the inhumanity and brutality of the zionist entity. Over 27 and 28 July, three Palestinians were murdered, two of them children. Seventeen-year-old Mohmen al-Hams was shot in the chest while attending the border protests at Rafah. The previous day, 12-year old Majdi Ramzi Kamal al-Sutra was also shot to death.
Despite the façade of international respectability as the ‘only democracy in the middle east’, the Israelis are literally child killers; the Fred West of international affairs. An additional 184 were wounded, including 14 children, 10 women, four paramedics and a journalist. These are the so-called ‘Hamas militants and terrorists’ being targeted by Israel.
Saturday 14 July saw two further children killed in the largest daylight attack on Gaza since 2014. Air raids were carried out across Gaza. Fifteen-year-old Amir al-Nimra and sixteen-year-old Luay Kaheel were among the victims.
We could go on listing the children killed by Israel recently. This year alone it has murdered 30 Palestinian children, 24 in Gaza, six in the West Bank. With every additional death, the further normalised such brutality becomes, the further Israel sees it may act with impunity.
In total (as of 3 August), 17,259 Palestinians have been injured in the protests – 3,279 of them children and 1,553 of them women. A further 6,000 Palestinians presently languish in Israeli prisons, 300 of them children.
So, whilst the elation shown at the release of 17-year-old Ahed al-Tamimi from prison is totally understandable, attention needs to be brought to these many other cases of Israeli child abuse.
Whereas only one Israeli soldier has ever been charged with killing a Palestinian child, these children can face up to 20 years in prison for the audacity of throwing a stone at their heavily-armed occupiers.
Israeli impunity is illuminated further by the fact that an Egyptian-brokered period of ‘calm’ was agreed between Israel and Hamas, coming into effect at 12.00pm on 20 July. The so-called ‘calm’ has turned out to be a period of killing children and pregnant women.
No agreement will be worth the paper it is written on unless it involves a power capable of reining in Israel. Such powers are few and far between. Which brings us to US President Donald Trump’s much trumpeted ‘deal of the century’.
For some time, US foreign policy circles have been telling the world that a deal for Palestine is coming. Originally expected to be announced after Ramadan, the detail of the plan remains clouded in mystery. Speculation abounds, but educated estimations do not predict favourable terms for the Palestinians.
The details are being put together by President Trump’s son-in-law Jared Kushner, US ambassador to Israel David Friedman, and middle east special envoy Jason Greenblatt. How three unashamedly pro-Israel individuals can possibly produce a ‘deal of the century’ capable of truly solving the Israel-Palestine issue is beyond comprehension.
First of all, all three have previously spoken in favour of Israeli settlement-building. From such a starting point, which is in flagrant contradiction of the 1993 Oslo peace accords, it is all too clear that they are incapable of producing a solution.
The settlement issue was one of seven key issues on the table at Oslo. To ignore this is to ignore the existing framework for ‘peace’. In addition, Kushner and Friedman have also came out in favour of Israel’s recent Nation State law, which promotes settlement-building as a key Israeli objective.
Oslo has also been negated by the US recognition of Jerusalem as Israel’s capital. The status of Jerusalem was deemed the key final issue for resolution at Oslo. But the unilateral US declaration of Jerusalem as Israel’s capital has taken the issue off the table.
The opening of the US embassy there kills Palestinian hopes that East Jerusalem could the the capital of a Palestinian state. Since this can no longer be achieved by negotiation with the imperialists, US policy is providing fertile soil for armed struggle to grow. The Palestinian hand is continually being forced by such false promises
The third undermining of Oslo by the US has been evident in the attack on the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine (UNRWA). Leaked extracts from Kushner’s emails show his intent to “disrupt” UNRWA. He also proposes terminating the refugee status of some 5 million Palestinians in countries like Jordan and Lebanon.
The emails were sent in January 2018, the same month as Trump cut funding to UNRWA. With the US pressuring Arab states to strip Palestinians of refugee status, co-ordinated with cuts to UNRWA, there can be no coincidence here. Instead, both must be seen as part of a wider, sinister US strategy to suffocate Palestine.
UNRWA provides aid and services to Palestinian refugees who currently reside in host countries lacking the infrastructure to cope with the refugee population. Cutting its funding will leave millions of already poverty-stricken refugees in a helpless predicament.
Adding insult to injury is the attempt to strip them of their refugee status, thereby stripping them of their one glimmer of hope: the right to return. Rather than forcefully evicted Palestinians being allowed to return home, Kushner and co are committed to further settlement-building, thereby creating further refugees, who will now be refugees in all but name.
Again, the Palestinian hand is forced. For if UNRWA is closed down and the Palestinians are stripped of refugee status, this implies that the issue is settled. Like Jerusalem and settlement-building, the refugee issue will be off the table in any negotiated deal. (What Jared Kushner’s ‘deal of the century’ would mean for Palestinian refugees by Anne Irfan, The Conversation, 10 August 2018)
An obvious question then arises. Why would the Palestinians accept such a deal?
“The Palestinians should prepare for the day the Trump administration offers to be the first western power to recognise ‘a Palestinian state’ while simultaneously recognising Israel’s sovereignty over settlement blocks and accepting its security red lines.
“The US will ensure Palestine becomes a full member of the United Nations with all the trappings of independence, even if it lacks full control over its borders, skies, ports and immigration. And Washington could also send an ambassador there, encourage Israeli and Arab governments to exchange ambassadors and sponsor joint projects with the two states.
“The US may also recognise Palestine’s capital in East Jerusalem with special status for the holy Islamic sites, but leave it to the parties to draw the lines between east and west Jerusalem. Mind you, Israel has redrawn and expanded the borders of metropolitan Jerusalem several times since the occupation five decades ago, and will only agree to withdraw from east of East Jerusalem, if at all.
“Neither the US nor Israel will object to the Palestinians using grand names and titles that connote authority and prestige as long as these don’t translate into reality on the ground. For all they care, the Palestinians may name their new entity the Republic of Great Palestine so long as it has little more than quasi-autonomy …
“This type of shock diplomacy works best in the worst of times, which explains why the Trump administration has launched an all-out sadistic assault on the UN Relief and Works Agency, UNRWA, that cares for the survival and education of 4-5 million refugees and their descendants.
“As Israel expands its illegal settlements, strangles the Gaza Strip, and passes new legislation that legitimises jewish supremacy in the land of Israel, ie, all over historical Palestine; as foreign aid shrinks, political divisions deepen, and the Arab world implodes in conflict, the Palestinians find themselves with fewer remedies every day. In this environment, any prescription that promises a new horizon for a healthier future may seem like a necessary medicine, no matter how bitter …
“It is no coincidence then that Kushner and company are bypassing the Palestinian Authority and starting with the terribly impoverished Gaza Strip. In their recent Washington Post article, the trio offered US assistance to the Strip if the financially bankrupt, politically deadlocked Hamas agreed to step aside or accept a long-term ceasefire deal with Israel.
“Enter Egyptian mediation for a separate deal between Hamas and Israel, promising aid and prosperity, just when the latter blockades, starves and cuts fuel to the more than two million inhabitants of the Gaza Strip.
“All of which forces the question: what are the Palestinians to do?
“They can’t complain about not being consulted, as it was President Abbas who severed all dialogue with the Trump administration after the latter’s recognition of Jerusalem as the capital of Israel.
“And they can’t just object or abstain as the PLO has done in recent years. American diplomats have already warned President Abbas to either step up or step aside. And to add insult to injury, de facto Saudi leader Mohammed bin Salman has also warned the Palestinians to either accept the American proposal or ‘shut up’.
“Despite recent reassurances from his father King Salman, the Saudi leader, just like his Emirati and Egyptian counterparts, is likely to continue to coordinate with Israel, even if that means leaving the Palestinians behind.
“So, the Palestinian leaders would need to decide when the time comes: accept and negotiate for more albeit within a new tighter framework, or reject and suffer the consequences – isolation, retribution, or worse, replacement.” (Trump and Palestine: Shock of the century by Marwan Bishara, Al Jazeera, 6 August 2018)
A deal that is divorced from the Palestinian reality is doomed to failure. Imperialism’s solutions are no solutions. With the key issues of settlements, the status of refugees and Jerusalem off the table, little is on the table. There is little chance of Abbas being able to accept such a deal, and Hamas certainly won’t.
Abbas has already called the deal the ‘slap of the century’. Therefore, the winner of this entire process will prove to be Israel and Netanyahu.
Knowing the Palestinians could not accept these terms, Netanyahu can accept the deal, even if it contains things he does not like. The zionists will be able to present themselves to the world as the pragmatists who want peace. The Palestinians will be painted as unreasonable, irreparable antisemites committed to violence.
So the narrative will proceed.
Whatever the fanatical hopes of US imperialism and its zionist stooges, such a scenario will not come to pass, for Palestinian resistance will in the end serve to frustrate this fantasy.
Palestinians are fighting for their land, homes and hearths; they are resisting oppression and expropriation. They have got nowhere else to go. Through their struggle over the years, they have acted as the spearhead of the Arab people’s struggle for liberation against imperialism – a role they continue to perform to this day and are bound to carry on doing in days to come.
If US imperialism and Israeli zionism do not sincerely implement the two-state solution in a meaningful way, zionism will have to face the choice of accepting either a binational state in which Palestinian Arabs and jews enjoy equal political and civil rights, or a zionist state ruling over the Palestinian people through a system of apartheid, with a total denial of all rights to the Palestinian people and the perpetration of daily violence against them.
Either option will spell doom for the whole idea of a jewish state as envisioned by zionism. The forward march of history, demographics and world opinion are increasingly converging towards turning the entire project of a jewish state into a historical abortion.
The zionists and their imperialist masters know it. That is why they are frantically characterising anyone who opposes them, or even criticises them, as antisemitic.
One has only to glance at the hysterical accusations levelled by zionists against Jeremy Corbyn, leader of the Labour party, to realise the panic that drives zionism and the extent to which zionists are prepared to go in pursuit of their racist policy and in defence of the racist state of Israel.
However, even this campaign is only too likely to backfire, for decent people will perceive it for what it is – a revolting obscenity.