Turkey plays with conflagration in Syria

If Erdogan isn’t careful, he could find himself in outright confrontation not only with Syrian but also Russian armed forces.

Lalkar writers

Subscribe to our channel

Turkey’s attempts to seize the Syrian province of Idlib is bringing closer the prospect of a direct confrontation with Russia. Meanwhile, the Syrian army continues to advance, deternined to liberate every inch of Syrian soil from occupation, be that by the jihadi gangsters or their Turkish and US puppet-masters.

Lalkar writers

Subscribe to our channel

In recent weeks the Syrian Arab Army (SAA) has made steady progress towards the liberation of the northwestern province of Idlib, the last terrorist stronghold in Syria.

The terror group HTS, better known as al-Nusra, has occupied the would-be de-escalation zone and used it as a base from which to launch thousands of terror attacks in the past couple of months alone, underlining the urgent need to push the jihadis back towards the Turkish border.

Syrian army advance into Idlib

To this end the SAA, assisted by Russian air cover, has been making inroads from the south of Idlib. At the end of January it drove insurgents out of Maarat al-Numan, the second largest town in Idlib province, strategically located on the main highway linking the capital Damascus with Aleppo in northern Syria.

Other towns liberated by the liberation forces include Saraqib, al-Eis and many others.

In striving to clear the north-west from its occupation by al-Nusra, the army is exercising its right to uphold Syria’s sovereignty.

In so doing, it is simply acting in accordance with the Sochi memorandum of understanding signed by Turkey and Russia in 2018, and is also acting against al-Nusra forces which are branded as terrorists by the United Nations.

Yet neither Turkey nor the UN security council see matters in this way.

Hypocrisy at the UN

The UN, unfazed by the thousands of terror attacks being launched by al-Nusra in the north-west, suddenly hits the panic button when it sees the national-liberation forces of the SAA making short work of jihad.

Sure enough, the USA, Britain and France rushed to bounce the security council into a special meeting, giving the US and its gang the opportunity to denounce Syria for its lawful actions.

As Russia’s envoy to the UN noted sardonically: “The unplanned meetings have a common pattern now: we meet together precisely when the terrorists in Syria are under threat, and the Syrian government is regaining control of its national territory.” (Unplanned meetings on Syria convene when UN-recognised terrorists are under attack, RT, 7 February 2020)

When the envoy turned the tables and denounced the US occupation of Syria and the theft of Syrian oil, the president of the security council rudely shut him up, thereby demonstrating the ‘objectivity’ of the UN, this neutered international body.

Ankara’s broken promise

Turkey was no better pleased than the US at the Syrian army’s vigorous measures against the jihadi infestation. Yet by acting to enforce the demilitarised zone in Idlib, the SAA was simply performing the task that Ankara had promised to undertake in concert with Russia back at the Sochi peace conference in 2018.

Under the memorandum of understanding, Ankara was going to use its influence with the jihadis to achieve through diplomacy what would otherwise require force. According to terms of the agreement, all tanks, artillery and mortars were to be pulled out of the demilitarised zone (DMZ) by October 2018, and the Turkish army would, jointly with Russian military police, patrol and monitor the DMZ.

After many extensions of the deadline it became clear that Ankara either could not or would not deliver on its obligations, and was instead using its observation posts, installed along the border for the ostensible purpose of enforcing the DMZ, as places to afford cover for al-Nusra and related jihadi gangs.

One of the stated goals of the joint memorandum was to get traffic flowing safely along the main roads M4 (Aleppo-Latakia) and M5 (Aleppo-Hama) – which is what finally started to happen thanks to the current SAA offensive. What cannot be achieved by persuasion must be accomplished by other means.

Turkish president Recep Tayyip Erdogan, however, is refusing to accept the defeat of his plans to overthrow the Syrian government through the mobilisation and arming of jihadis. He has continued to arm the local terrorists, thus enabling them to shoot down two Syrian government military aircraft.

In retaliation, the SAA launched an attack on Turkish troops in Syria that left a further 36 dead and as many seriously injured.

Turkey also supported the jihadis in seizing back control of towns that the SAA had painstakingly succeeded in returning to government control only a few weeks previously, in particular the town of Saraqib, which guards the M5 highway south of Aleppo as it passes through Idlib.

Though Russia originally held back from intervention in order to avoid escalating the situation, this was a step too far on Turkey’s part, and on 2 March the Russian air force and ground forces joined with the SAA in returning Saraqib to government control.

In the meantime, President Erdogan has been demanding support from his Nato allies, which shows no sign of being forthcoming, beyond a certain amount of logistical support from the European Union.

Much as these imperialist hyenas would have liked to see the downfall of the Syrian government, most have reluctantly realised that it is no easy thing to overthrow a government that has the active or passive support of most of the population, and they are now anxious not to throw good money after bad.

Furiously, Erdogan has opened his borders to millions of refugees, whom the EU had paid him handsomely to keep in Turkey.

Even the US is unwilling to lend a hand, given Erdogan’s recent purchase of a Russian missile defence system in preference to a US system, made at a time when Erdogan was angry with the US over its support of Kurdish rebels whom Turkey regards as a threat to its territorial integrity and fiercely opposes.

In the circumstances, Erdogan is on his way to meet with Russian president Vladimir Putin in an attempt on both their parts to break the impasse. For the sake of the people of the whole region one can only hope President Putin is able to persuade him to let the Syrian government restore peace after so many bitter years of war.

Erdogan has been claiming to have the interests of Syria’s displaced population at heart when intervening to prevent the Syrian government from recovering control of its own territory, but the truth is that when peace is restored and the terrorists have been routed, millions who have been forced to flee will be able thankfully to return to rebuild their homes and their lives.

Turkey is now standing as an obstacle to that outcome, and as such is setting itself up for its forcible removal should Erdogan continue in his stubborn stance.

It is to be hoped that, having previously made some headway in distancing Turkey from its former slavish relations with the US, Erdogan will not mistake his personal weakness for the Muslim Brotherhood for the real national interests of Turkey.

Victory to the Syrian president, government, army and people!